Russian newspaper «Now» has sent a request to the Prosecutor of Switzerland on the facts set forth in the report of the Fund of struggle against corruption Alexei Navalny and received a reply in the shortest possible time.
Recall that the results of the investigation conducted by Navalny and his associates, suggests that Artem Chaika, the son of Prosecutor General Yury Chaika and resident of Switzerland, is in cahoots with criminal elements, with extremely profitable business and keeps their money in Swiss banks.
«The office of the attorney General of Switzerland does not conduct criminal proceedings against the mentioned persons,» said the correspondent of «date» the Prosecutor General’s office of Switzerland. About it writes on Wednesday, December 2, the website NEWSru.com.
The article says that the accounts Artem Chaika serves law firm Murat Hapsirokov, the son of a former chief of the Prosecutor General, now a Senator from Adygeya Nazir Hapsirokov. According to the publication, a partner of this firm is the former head of the migration office of the Canton of Vaud Francois Taren, «which in 90-e years have helped to buy a house, one of the leaders of the Solntsevo OPG Sergey Mikhailov, nicknamed Mikhas». The editors of «the Present» tried to contact the Taren, however, hearing the name of Artema of the Seagull, he hung up.
The investigation FBK interested in the state Duma. In particular, the Deputy from the Communist party faction Vladimir Bessonov on Wednesday at the plenary session of the lower house of Parliament proposed to invite the public Prosecutor at the extraordinary «government hour».
Bessonov says that the MPs are «surprised and outraged» by the story of the Seagull and his family, and hoped that this investigation will draw attention to «those who didn’t see him».
It is worth noting that Vladimir Bessonov, requiring to call upon a Seagull to the answer in connection with a criminal investigation, is himself a defendant in a criminal case: he is accused of attack on police officers in Rostov-on-don four years ago. At the end of October the parliamentarian changed the measure of restraint from recognizance not to leave on arrest, but before consideration on 16 December his appeal against the decision, he remains at large.
State Duma Deputy Dmitry Gudkov said on his blog on the social network Facebook that in the lower house of the Russian Parliament «say little» about the scandal with the Seagull: «discuss «on the sidelines», but in the boardroom – one word.» Hooters, he said, will support the initiative on holding parliamentary investigation, if such offer arrives from the Communist party.
The newspaper reminds that on the eve of the FBC published the film investigates where it comes to Yuri Chaika sons – Artem and Igor. Most of the materials devoted to the eldest son of the Prosecutor General Chaika Artem. In particular, the investigation says that he allegedly does business with people associated with the gang Sergey Hoe, who is accused of killing 12 people in stanitsa Kushchevskaya Krasnodar region. On the eve of Navalny said that the people who are tired of «this mafia,» agreed to tell the Fund about the criminal context, the sons of the public Prosecutor, have been threatened. At FBC believe that the facts stated in this film, enough to excite dozens of criminal cases and the resignation of the leadership of Genprokuratury.
The President’s press Secretary Dmitry Peskov yesterday told journalists that the Kremlin had not seen the materials of the investigation. But after the day before the investigation received wide publicity, the Kremlin decided not to rush to learn the details.
The Prosecutor’s office, unlike the Swiss Prosecutor’s office, was unable to immediately comment on RBC data, the investigation of the FBC. The Investigative Committee on the question of whether the test set out in the investigation of the facts, but neither responded. Novaya Gazeta on Wednesday published an official response to its request to the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, which States that the Prosecutor is not obliged to check information on the property the adult relatives of the prosecutors.